SCREEN PROFITS REPORT
Hitch
2005 · Andy Tennant · Will Smith | James Lassiter | Teddy Zee · 1 hr 58 min
A smooth-talking man falls for a hardened columnist while helping a shy accountant woo a beautiful heiress.
SCREEN PROFITS REPORT
2005 · Andy Tennant · Will Smith | James Lassiter | Teddy Zee · 1 hr 58 min
A smooth-talking man falls for a hardened columnist while helping a shy accountant woo a beautiful heiress.
| Cast | Year | Salary | Inflation adjusted salary | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will Smith | 2005 | $20,000,000Smith earned $20 million for movies like Ali, Men in Black II, Bad Boys II, Hitch, and Hancock.source | $32,964,670 | (rep) |
| Eva Mendes | 2005 | $957,291 | $1,577,839 | (est) |
| Kevin James | 2005 | $2,302,709 | $3,795,402 | (est) |
| Amber Valletta | 2005 | $1,119,632 | $1,845,415 | (est) |
| Michael Rapaport | 2005 | $332,044 | $547,286 | (est) |
| Adam Arkin | 2005 | $255,217 | $420,657 | (est) |
Inflation-adjusted values are shown in 2025 dollars when CPI data is available.
| Category | Year | Reported | Inflation Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic Domestic theatrical box office gross. | 2005 | $179,495,555 | $295,850,585 |
| International International theatrical box office gross. | 2005 | $192,098,655 | $316,623,436 |
| Worldwide Combined worldwide theatrical box office gross. | 2005 | $371,594,210 | $596,872,011 |
Estimated revenues and expenses for films based on currently imported reported and estimated fields. Inflation-adjusted values use the CPI table when direct adjusted values are not present in the export.
| Category | Year | Reported | Inflation Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues | |||
| Theatrical Net Revenue Estimated distributor theatrical revenue using the year-based ScreenProfits finance model. | 2005 | $166,587,240 (est) | $274,574,667 (est) |
| Digital Rentals Estimated digital rental revenue from the year-based ScreenProfits finance model. | 2005 | $1,957,042 | $3,225,662 |
| Digital Purchases Estimated digital purchase revenue from the year-based ScreenProfits finance model. | 2005 | $369,023 | $608,236 |
| Physical Rentals Estimated physical rental revenue from the year-based ScreenProfits finance model. | 2005 | $26,299,761 | $43,348,147 |
| Physical Purchases Physical Purchases: VHS $756,104, DVD $37,049,087 | 2005 | $37,805,191 | $62,311,782 |
| TV & Streaming Revenue Estimated ancillary TV and streaming revenue from the year-based ScreenProfits finance model. | 2005 | $37,172,789 (est) | $61,269,435 (est) |
| Total Revenues Total of the revenue streams currently available or derived in this ScreenProfits profitability view. | 2005 | $270,191,045 | $445,337,928 |
| Expenses | |||
| Budget Production budget. | 2005 | $70,000,000 | $112,437,276 |
| Print & Advertising (P&A) P&A Estimated using Machine Learning sourceSource: ML P&A estimate (peer+ridge)Machine-learned P&A estimate based on peer comps and regression inputs. Reestimate Prior Estimate | Covid Mult: 1 | Peer Count: 2 | Reg Box Pred: $59,854,660 | Reg Main Pred: $33,212,685 | 2005 | $50,160,000 (est) | $82,675,392 (est) |
| Participations Talent and producer participation payouts. Parsed from source context when available, otherwise estimated from the year-based ScreenProfits finance model. | 2005 | $16,869,666 (est) | $27,805,148 (est) |
| Residuals Residual and related distribution expense line. Parsed from source context when available, otherwise estimated from the year-based ScreenProfits finance model. | 2005 | $6,673,719 (est) | $10,999,847 (est) |
| Interest & Overhead Interest and overhead allocation. Parsed from source context when available, otherwise estimated from the year-based ScreenProfits finance model. | 2005 | $8,400,000 (est) | $13,845,161 (est) |
| Total Expenses Total of budget, P&A, participations, residuals, and interest/overhead in this ScreenProfits profitability view. | 2005 | $152,103,385 | $247,762,824 |
| Movie Net Profit or Loss Estimated movie net profit/loss from the current ScreenProfits revenue and expense model. | 2005 | $118,087,661 | $197,575,105 |
Related titles based on shared genres and franchise overlap.
Editorial posts linked to this movie will be highlighted here via the post-to-movie relationship table.