Romantic Comedy
Dynamic genre archive. Imported movies in this genre will show automatically.
Movies576
Years1979-2020
Avg Score57.5
Worldwide Gross$22,400,803,030
Budget to WW Gross Multiple2.07x
Total Profit$-1,607,423,109
Total Profit (Inflation Adj)$-1,540,464,534
Top Movies in Romantic Comedy
| Poster | Movie | Year | Overall | Popularity % | Box Office % | Worldwide | Profit/Loss (Est.) | Profit (Inflation Adj) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1996 | 62.5 | 65.6% | 53.5% | $10M | -$17M | -$33M | |
|
1995 | 76.2 | 77.1% | 83.3% | $39M | -$17M | -$33M | |
|
1996 | 39.0 | 30.7% | 59.7% | $13M | -$16M | -$33M | |
|
1985 | 31.9 | 21.2% | 31.3% | $5M | -$12M | -$33M | |
|
2000 | 60.1 | 61.8% | 68.5% | $23M | -$19M | -$34M | |
|
2004 | 76.1 | 79.2% | 81.4% | $42M | -$21M | -$34M | |
|
2016 | 48.4 | 68.2% | 20.4% | $29K | -$26M | -$34M | |
|
2004 | 67.0 | 75.3% | 69.7% | $12M | -$21M | -$34M | |
|
2012 | 83.0 | 92.5% | 84.5% | $54M | -$25M | -$35M | |
|
2007 | 67.4 | 73.8% | 72.9% | $16M | -$23M | -$35M | |
|
1996 | 66.8 | 53.1% | 86.9% | $41M | -$18M | -$35M | |
|
2013 | 57.1 | 79.4% | 14.1% | $10K | -$26M | -$35M | |
|
2018 | 72.0 | 90.3% | 45.6% | $405K | -$29M | -$36M | |
|
1992 | 66.8 | 66.3% | 56.4% | $11M | -$16M | -$37M | |
|
2005 | 85.9 | 91.5% | 90.9% | $103M | -$24M | -$37M | |
|
2010 | 71.4 | 74.0% | 77.1% | $42M | -$26M | -$37M | |
|
1999 | 48.1 | 39.3% | 63.6% | $9M | -$20M | -$37M | |
|
1998 | 39.4 | 32.7% | 46.9% | $4M | -$20M | -$39M | |
|
1991 | 73.9 | 76.0% | 74.2% | $23M | -$17M | -$39M | |
|
2004 | 66.4 | 69.5% | 78.2% | $30M | -$24M | -$40M | |
|
2008 | 79.2 | 89.5% | 91.1% | $111M | -$29M | -$40M | |
|
1999 | 78.6 | 84.7% | 81.5% | $40M | -$22M | -$41M | |
|
2003 | 74.5 | 76.5% | 79.2% | $39M | -$24M | -$41M | |
|
2003 | 62.6 | 63.6% | 73.5% | $22M | -$25M | -$43M | |
|
2002 | 59.0 | 64.3% | 71.9% | $20M | -$25M | -$44M | |
|
1992 | 24.7 | 12.0% | 36.6% | $3M | -$20M | -$44M | |
|
2002 | 76.1 | 82.0% | 86.0% | $69M | -$26M | -$44M | |
|
2019 | 87.2 | 92.6% | 86.8% | $54M | -$36M | -$44M | |
|
2002 | 81.0 | 88.9% | 73.2% | $25M | -$26M | -$45M | |
|
2016 | 49.1 | 54.7% | 44.0% | $421K | -$3M | -$46M | |
|
2001 | 48.4 | 51.2% | 56.8% | $12M | -$26M | -$46M | |
|
2003 | 63.2 | 70.6% | 71.2% | $15M | -$28M | -$47M | |
|
2006 | 74.3 | 79.2% | 81.5% | $42M | -$30M | -$47M | |
|
1995 | 81.9 | 77.8% | 88.0% | $60M | -$25M | -$49M | |
|
1997 | 38.8 | 40.8% | 43.4% | $4M | -$25M | -$49M | |
|
2000 | 60.9 | 65.7% | 69.3% | $26M | -$27M | -$49M | |
|
2001 | 58.0 | 64.7% | 65.0% | $20M | -$29M | -$51M | |
|
2012 | 68.3 | 74.8% | 82.5% | $38M | -$37M | -$51M | |
|
1991 | 44.7 | 37.0% | 60.8% | $12M | -$23M | -$52M | |
|
2004 | 63.7 | 74.4% | 68.4% | $11M | -$31M | -$52M | |
|
1995 | 76.3 | 74.3% | 86.9% | $54M | -$26M | -$52M | |
|
1996 | 29.5 | 27.4% | 31.1% | $1M | -$27M | -$53M | |
|
2003 | 63.8 | 61.0% | 75.1% | $24M | -$31M | -$54M | |
|
1996 | 48.0 | 45.0% | 54.2% | $10M | -$27M | -$55M | |
|
1997 | 48.3 | 32.1% | 66.4% | $17M | -$30M | -$58M | |
|
1998 | 81.9 | 79.4% | 85.7% | $78M | -$31M | -$59M | |
|
1993 | 51.2 | 48.7% | 57.1% | $11M | -$27M | -$59M | |
|
1994 | 56.2 | 47.1% | 80.8% | $31M | -$28M | -$59M | |
|
1994 | 43.3 | 26.8% | 71.5% | $21M | -$28M | -$60M | |
|
1985 | 12.0 | 6.6% | 15.5% | $2M | -$21M | -$62M |